patching...
Update: Have an announcement or event you want to promote? We've got a tool for that.
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Conservatives Head To Capitol To Protest Recent Judges' Decisons

Organizers are angered with rulings on voter ID law, collective bargaining and more — and they want to send a message via a protest rally.

 

Area conservatives have planned a rally protesting recent decisions made by Dane County judges from 10 to 11 a.m. Saturday at the state Capitol in Madison.

The organizing group consists of Caledonia resident Eddie Willing, a member of  Founders Intent; Paris Procopis, an activist affiliated with Founders Intent; Wisconsin state treasurer Kurt Schuller; the Tea Party Patriots; an unnamed former judge; and an unnamed state legislator.

“We demand they respect the other two branches of government and allow our state to run by the consent of the people,” according to a statement released by the group. “Our state Constitution needs judges that apply the law the people write, not reinterpret it.”

The purpose of the rally is to remind “judges they are consistently ruling against the democratic majority in this great state,” according to the statement.

The group cited several examples of decisions, including DNR regulations, voter ID laws and the collective bargaining law — and call the judges' actions an abuse of power.

The law that ended most collective bargaining rights for public employees was struck down Friday by Dane County Circuit Judge Juan Colas. Dane County Circuit Judge David Flanagan in July decided that the voter ID law would be a "substantial impairment of the right to vote" under the state constitution.

According to the press release:

"June 5 was the day Wisconsin voters put an end to 18 months of drama, manipulation of our system and outside national pressures on local Wisconsin governing, when our state overwhelmingly re-elected our governor. It was a win for the administration, but even more so for the conservative agenda and the People of this state."

In addition to Procopis and Willing, other speakers will include Ross Brown, a local activist and leader of We The People of The Republic; and Jenny Beth Martin of the Tea Party Patriots.

If You Go 

WHAT: "We Ain’t Backing Down" rally against activist judges

WHERE: North Hamilton St Access – Wisconsin State Capitol, Madison

WHEN: 10 to 11 a.m. Saturday 

For information: https://www.facebook.com/events/408964145823690/

Related Topics: Collective Bargaining, Dane County Circuit Court, Eddie Willing, Founters Intent, Tea Party Patriots, and voter ID

Richard Head

5:00 am on Thursday, September 20, 2012

This brings to light that it's time to end the tyranny of property and income taxes - where you are forced, under threat of assault by a SWAT Team and forcible confiscation of property, to fund those who seek to destroy you and take your property.

The Left just laughs at you - because they destroy you with the funds they force you to supply. Want to change things? Defund them.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Ed Willing

7:52 am on Thursday, September 20, 2012

Completely agree, Richard! The Money is the only leverage!

TOM Simons

8:46 am on Thursday, September 20, 2012

Dear (Richard Head-appropriately named) & Edward- CAN YOU SPELL "KOCH BROTHERS"???????? HOPEFULLY THEY ALL HAVE PERMITS TO GATHER !!!!!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Ed Willing

10:20 am on Thursday, September 20, 2012

Dear Tom Simmons, yes we have permits. Not that it stops your side....

And, the KOCH bros have nothing to do with this event. In fact, would it make you smile to know AFP was not supporting this event at all, because they're doing their own activity this weekend?

Ignorance is rampant.

Comment_arrow

Ed Willing

10:24 am on Thursday, September 20, 2012

Oh, btw, can you spell PRITZKER, BONDERMANN, STRYKER, RESNICK, ETC? Yeah, dodnt even HAVE TO say Soros. ;) you have your billionaires. We have ours. Deal with it.

Comment_arrow

Brian Dey

7:38 pm on Thursday, September 20, 2012

Typical liberal response:

1. Koch Bros.
2. Bush's fault
3. ALEC
4. Personal attacks

Why don't you lefties try something new for a change,,,lmao

Pat Mullikin

9:20 am on Thursday, September 20, 2012

Tom, it is widely understood among adults that as soon as one begins the name-calling, they have conceded the debate.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Rees Roberts

11:34 am on Thursday, September 20, 2012

Thank you Pat Mullikin. Well said.

James R Hoffa

11:50 am on Thursday, September 20, 2012

Sounds like a great event - Hoffa is certain that several patriots will be sure to attend!

Reply
Comment_arrow

James R Hoffa

5:38 pm on Thursday, September 20, 2012

@Edward -

Hoffa would love to, however the recent medical emergency with his grandmother will unfortunately prevent him from making this rally ;-(

@Tom Jefferson -

Hoffa is one of the biggest patriots you'll ever meet! In fact Hoffa just ordered his brand new pair of New Balance 587 shoes, 100% made in the USA with domestic sourced materials. Can you honestly say the same about your shoes? Well....

bayjer

5:16 pm on Thursday, September 20, 2012

Amazing when a judge rules against a law the republicians like, it's a bad happening, how ever when a judge like Posser rules in favor of their pet laws its a good thing. I wonder whats with this picture?

Reply

Timothy Scheffler

5:23 pm on Thursday, September 20, 2012

Dane County judges must learn from the US Supreme Court. Congress and the President passed Obamacare and they refused to overturn it. The lawmaking process should always trump the constitution when defining our legal rights. Of course that also means that the US Supreme Court should have let Chicago and D.C.'s gun bans stay in place, but, hey, what court is perfect?

Reply

George Cleveland

5:43 pm on Thursday, September 20, 2012

Its called separation of powers. When one branch of government oversteps its bounds its the job of another branch to rein them in. Ruling in favor of the constitution, State or Federal, and striking down a law passed by those who have received a majority of votes is often unpopular but its also what keeps people free from the tyranny of the majority, no matter who that majority may be. Judges should reach their decision free from political pressures and in accord with their (not the politicians) interpretation of the constitution. In an ideal world any demonstration would be ignored by the judiciary and decisions reached through the use of logic and reason.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Brian Dey

7:47 pm on Thursday, September 20, 2012

But it is not their job to interpret the Constitution, it is to follow it to the letter.

Comment_arrow

James R Hoffa

7:48 pm on Thursday, September 20, 2012

@George Cleveland -

And judges are also people, thus imperfect. That's why there are multiple levels to our judicial system. Certain courts/judges clearly think of themselves as being above the constitutional constraints placed on their power, which becomes self-evident when they are constantly overturned by the higher levels of the judicial system. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals and the Dane County Circuit Court have both proven themselves to fall into such category merely by how often and consistently their rulings are effectively overturned upon appeal.

That's what is being protested - not the judiciary or the principle of separation of powers, but rather judges that act above their own limited constitutional authority.

Redd Greene Blu

7:06 pm on Thursday, September 20, 2012

Well Said Mr. Cleveland. Informed and prudent.

Reply

George Cleveland

8:13 pm on Thursday, September 20, 2012

@Brian Dey. Your opinion would be met with surprise by Alexander Hamilton and the other founders.

"[T]he courts were designed to be an intermediate body between the people and the legislature, in order, among other things, to keep the latter within the limits assigned to their authority. The interpretation of the laws is the proper and peculiar province of the courts. A constitution is, in fact, and must be regarded by the judges as, a fundamental law. It, therefore, belongs to them to ascertain its meaning, as well as the meaning of any particular act proceeding from the legislative body."
-Alexander Hamilton Federalist Paper #78

Reply
Comment_arrow

Brian Dey

9:13 pm on Thursday, September 20, 2012

Jefferson wrote to Abigail Adams (wife of former President John Adams) in 1804:

"The Constitution... meant that its coordinate branches should be checks on each other. But the opinion which gives to the judges the right to decide what laws are constitutional and what not, not only for themselves in their own sphere of action but for the Legislature and Executive also in their spheres, would make the Judiciary a despotic branch."

Comment_arrow

Brian Dey

9:14 pm on Thursday, September 20, 2012

Thomas Jefferson to Spencer Roane in 1819:

"In denying the right [the Supreme Court usurps] of exclusively explaining the Constitution, I go further than [others] do, if I understand rightly [this] quotation from the Federalist of an opinion that 'the judiciary is the last resort in relation to the other departments of the government, but not in relation to the rights of the parties to the compact under which the judiciary is derived.' If this opinion be sound, then indeed is our Constitution a complete felo de se[act of suicide]. For intending to establish three departments, coordinate and independent, that they might check and balance one another, it has given, according to this opinion, to one of them alone the right to prescribe rules for the government of the others, and to that one, too, which is unelected by and independent of the nation. For experience has already shown that the impeachment it has provided is not even a scare-crow... The Constitution on this hypothesis is a mere thing of wax in the hands of the judiciary, which they may twist and shape into any form they please."

Comment_arrow

Brian Dey

9:15 pm on Thursday, September 20, 2012

Thomas Jefferson to Edward Livingstone in 1825:

"This member of the Government was at first considered as the most harmless and helpless of all its organs. But it has proved that the power of declaring what the law is, ad libitum, by sapping and mining slyly and without alarm the foundations of the Constitution, can do what open force would not dare to attempt."

Comment_arrow

Brian Dey

9:16 pm on Thursday, September 20, 2012

Thomas Jefferson to William C. Jarvis in 1820:

"To consider the judges as the ultimate arbiters of all constitutional questions [is] a very dangerous doctrine indeed, and one which would place us under the despotism of an oligarchy. Our judges are as honest as other men and not more so. They have with others the same passions for party, for power, and the privilege of their corps. Their maxim is boni judicis est ampliare jurisdictionem [good justice is broad jurisdiction], and their power the more dangerous as they are in office for life and not responsible, as the other functionaries are, to the elective control. The Constitution has erected no such single tribunal, knowing that to whatever hands confided, with the corruptions of time and party, its members would become despots. It has more wisely made all the departments co-equal and co-sovereign within themselves."

Comment_arrow

Brian Dey

9:17 pm on Thursday, September 20, 2012

I am of the Jeffersonian mindset when it comes to legislating from the bench George.

Comment_arrow

Ed Willing

1:06 am on Friday, September 21, 2012

@Brian Dey

You pretty much just crushed him. :)

George Cleveland

8:42 pm on Thursday, September 20, 2012

@James Hoffa Really? You are protesting that the Dane County courts are often overturned on appeal? Seems a pretty feeble excuse to be out there. And pointless. What will you accomplish? Will the judges change their judiciary philosophy because you're out there caterwauling? It seems more that you are trying to ingratiate yourself to the powers that be, showing yourself as willing foot soldiers for Walker and Koch and the rest.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Brian Dey

9:19 pm on Thursday, September 20, 2012

And there it is...Koch Bros....Pricelss, predictable liberal response.

Comment_arrow

Brian Dey

9:27 pm on Thursday, September 20, 2012

And you are shill to your union George.

Comment_arrow

James R Hoffa

10:01 pm on Thursday, September 20, 2012

Yep, Koch Bros - you called it Brian Dey!

You think that George would have read your 7:38 pm on Thursday, September 20, 2012, response before posting this utterly pointless tripe, but no - instead he steps right into it, as expected.

George Cleveland

10:00 pm on Thursday, September 20, 2012

@Brian Dey Makes no difference what Jefferson thought. He lost on this one. No one questions the right of the courts to determine the constitutionality of the laws and haven't since Andrew Jackson, as far as I know. You lost this argument 175 years ago.

A shill is a paid supporter. I've supported unions and workers' rights my whole life, no matter if I worked in a union shop or not. No one has to pay me to do whats right. Can you say the same?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Ed Willing

1:09 am on Friday, September 21, 2012

A shill is, as you called Brian "a useful idiot" that does the dirty work, or unelegant debating online while the real adults go about the real business at hand. ;)

And in case you didn't know, Brian Dey receives no money to support what's right. Are you about to slander him with no evidence?

George Cleveland

10:13 pm on Thursday, September 20, 2012

@Hoffa Since I don't think Dey has any idea of how the world works, his opinions about unions or the Kochs and the Corporatocracy are not worth paying too much attention to. He's a blind follower of the economic elites. A "useful idiot" for those who would be our masters.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Ed Willing

1:07 am on Friday, September 21, 2012

Koch bros again.

I suppose Mr. Cleveland DOES know how the world works. Therefore, everyone should just shut down their businesses, resign public office and sit at his feet to learn.

Meanwhile, no one beyond Patch has ever heard of him. Because he knows how the world works....

Comment_arrow

Brian Dey

5:46 am on Friday, September 21, 2012

And yours are ? Let's s see, I served on a school board for three years, served as President of a corporation for the past 13 yrs, was a union machinist for 9 years, as a union negotiator, as a company negotiator, have employed many people over the years and negotiated 6 contracts twice in the public sector. And your experience is what? I stand by that you are a shill for the unons. Your opinions have no credibility as you bow only to the union that serves your self interests.

George Cleveland

5:18 am on Friday, September 21, 2012

@Willing No, lots of people have a good idea of how the world works. Just not the Tea Party.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Brian Dey

6:13 am on Friday, September 21, 2012

Says the guy that sees the world only through his union label.

Rees Roberts

7:45 am on Friday, September 21, 2012

sigh. again round and round it goes, when and where does it stop?

Reply

Matthew Jesmer

9:01 am on Friday, September 21, 2012

Where is the healthy debate? This is just two adult children having a pissing contest, in which both sides are pissing into the wind!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Ed Willing

7:17 am on Saturday, September 22, 2012

Way to piss into the wind, Matthew! ;) Welcome to the party. Touche

jt

12:30 am on Saturday, September 22, 2012

when is the republican party going to grow a set and tell the tea party to get out?

Reply
Comment_arrow

GearHead

8:07 am on Saturday, September 22, 2012

Tea party has invigorated the GOP, or haven't you noticed?

Leave a comment