patching...
Update: Have an announcement or event you want to promote? We've got a tool for that.
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Busy Week for Bills; Governor Walker Signs 21 New Laws

Homeowners are protected if they kill an intruder, researchers can use legal, prescription drugs in their work, and penalties got stiffer for folks who knowingly receive stolen firearms, amongst others.

 

It was a busy week for new laws this week; Governor Scott Walker signed 21 of them into law. Here's the list from a press release from the Governor's office:

Special Session Senate Bill 12 This bill indicates and specifically lists the factors a court must consider when determining whether attorney fees are reasonable. Those factors include things like the time and labor required, the novelty and difficulty of the case, and whether the case prohibited the attorney from taking on other work. The bill stipulates that when compensatory damages are awarded, reasonable attorney fees may not exceed three times the amount of the damages awarded.

“Protecting job creators from excessive attorney fees will improve our business climate, and ultimately help create jobs in the private sector,” said Governor Walker.  “I would like to thank State Senator Rich Zipperer and Representative Robin Vos for working to help improve Wisconsin’s economy.”

Special Session Senate Bill 22: This bill provides that a possessor of real property owes no duty of care to a trespasser on his or her property and may not be found liable for an act on the property that causes injury or death to a trespasser. It does indicate that a property owner may be liable if they recklessly caused the injury or death of a trespasser. This bill makes many liability exceptions for actions against trespassers that are children and takes into account several factors for determining whether or not a trespasser had implied consent to enter the property.

“Property owners shouldn’t be liable for an injury that occurs on their land sustained by an individual who is trespassing,” said Governor Walker.  “State Senator Pam Galloway and Representative Mike Kuglitsch provided great leadership on this important piece of legislation, which ultimately strengthens property rights in Wisconsin.”

Assembly Bill 48: This bill requires the Department of Natural Resources to make available to the public a written directory of all land acquired through stewardship funding that is open for public access as well as any stewardship land that was acquired before October 2007 for which public access has been restricted and the reasons for that action.

“This legislation increases transparency in our state government and makes it easier for residents to review how taxpayer funds are used for stewardship land,” said Governor Walker.  “Because of the efforts of State Senator Neil Kedzie and State Representative Jim Ott, the DNR can now enact another customer-friendly policy.” 

Assembly Bill 60: Under current law, all county officers must be covered by a county bond, however veterans service officers and veteran’s service commissioners (VSO) must be covered by individual surety bonds, which are more costly for counties to provide. This bill extends the law to require that all county officers, including veteran service officers and veteran’s service commissioners be covered by a county bond, which can mean being included in the county’s blanket bond. By removing the requirement that county VSO’s be bonded separately from the county’s overall blanket bond, counties will be able to increase administrative efficiency and increase the amount of money available for direct benefits to veterans living and working in their communities. 

“Signing this bill provides local units of government with the flexibility to effectively and efficiently manage both their finances and the administration of veterans service officers,” said Governor Walker.  “State Senator Rob Cowles and Representative Karl Van Roy did a great job delivering this bill to my desk.”  

Assembly Bill 69: This legislation creates a presumption of immunity in criminal and civil actions for individuals who use deadly force against a tresspasser who has unlawfully or forcibly entered their home, motor vehicle, or place of business. This bill does stipulate that deadly force may not be used in any case where a public safety worker has entered a property during the course of his or her professional duties. This bill will deter future criminal intrusions as well as provide added legal protections for those who use force to protect their home or property.

“By signing the castle doctrine into law, I am standing with those individuals who chose to protect their family and property,” said Governor Walker.  “State Senator Van Wanggaard and Representative Dean Kaufert provided great leadership on this important piece of legislation.”

Assembly Bill 81: This bill raises the forfeiture required for the fraudulent use of a disabled parking card issued by the Department of Transportation from not less than $50 and not more than $300 to not less than $200 and not more than $500.

“Strengthening the fines for unlawfully burdening individuals with disabilities is the right thing to do,” said Governor Walker.  “I would like to thank State Senator Dave Hansen and Representative Peggy Krusick for authoring this bill and working to pass it through the Legislature.”

Assembly Bill 103: Under current law, a person who intentionally receives stolen property (including a firearm) may be guilty of a misdemeanor or a felony, depending on the value of the property received. Under this bill a person who intentionally receives a stolen firearm, regardless of the value of the firearm, is guilty of a Class H felony and may be fined up to $10,000, imprisoned for up to six years, or both. Increasing the penalty for those who knowingly receive stolen firearms will help deter individuals from engaging in unlawful behavior as well as increase overall community safety.

“Clearly defining the penalties for intentionally receiving stolen firearms will help instill confidence that those carrying firearms are law abiding citizens,” said Governor Walker.  “I would like to thank State Senator Joe Leibham and Representative Dan LeMahieu for advancing this public safety proposal.”

Assembly Bill 245: This bill authorizes a manufacturer or wholesale distributor of prescription drugs to deliver prescription drugs to a faculty member of a public or private institution of higher education in Wisconsin as long as that faculty member is obtaining the drugs for the purpose of lawful research, teaching, or testing and not for resale.

“This bill will remove a burdensome regulation for Wisconsin’s great educational facilities,” said Governor Walker.  “Because State Senator Albert Darling and Representative Jim Ott worked on this legislation, education and research on prescription drugs will be easier.”

Assembly Bill 274: This bill is intended to improve public safety at railroad crossings by eliminating confusion and making current law more uniform. Under current law, an operator of a vehicle may not drive across a railroad crossing when a train occupies or is closely approaching the crossing. For railroad crossing purposes, this bill treats railroad track equipment similar to trains. Under this legislation a motorist must yield to all railroad track equipment at a railroad crossing.

“Clarifying existing law and making it uniform as it relates to railroad crossings will help improve safety on Wisconsin’s roadways,” said Governor Walker.  “I would like to thank State Senator Joe Leibham and Representative Jerry Petrowski for their work on this bill.”

Senate Bill 77: The State Trails Council advises the Department of Natural Resources regarding the planning, acquisition, development and management of state trails. This legislation expands the membership of the council from nine to eleven citizen members who must be both knowledgeable in and have participated in one or more of the various recreational uses of trails in Wisconsin.

“The increased membership on the State Trails Council contained in this bill highlights the importance of recreational trail use in Wisconsin,” said Governor Walker.  “State Senator Joe Leibham’s and Representative Steve Kestell’s legislation will help improve our state recreational trail network.”

Senate Bill 85: Current law prohibits retail theft and provides a penalty for retail theft based on the value of the merchandise stolen. This legislation expands the definition of merchandise to include services. Under this legislationn a person can be charged with retail theft if they obtain a service from a provider and fail or refuse to pay for the service. 

“Whether stealing tangible property or services, individuals who obtain stolen merchandise or services should be held accountable,” said Governor Walker.  “I would like to thank State Senator Rich Zipperer and Representative Joel Kleefisch for moving forward this legislation to bring fairness to Wisconsin’s stolen property laws.”

Senate Bill 95: This legislation provides K-12 schools more flexibility as well as state mandate relief in several key areas including, teacher evaluation, school district contracting guidelines, funding limits for specialized areas and reporting deadlines, among other things. This bill will allow school boards to link standardize test scores back to teachers and requires each school district to have a standard teacher evaluation plan in place. It expands the services that qualify for state special education aid to include orientation and mobility service, educational audiology, speech and language therapy and pupil transition services. It removes the cap on how much school funding can go towards the purchase of library computers and software and changes the deadline by which a districts’ tax levy must be certified by the municipal clerk to November 10th.

“Providing flexibility to school districts to reward the best teachers, help mentor those teachers that are struggling, and hold those who don’t improve accountable will ultimately help improve education for all students,” said Governor Walker. “Because of State Senator Luther Olsen’s and Representative Steve Kestell’s bill, school districts will have another option for evaluating teacher performance available to them.” 

Senate Bill 107: The legislation assists landlords in screening prospective tenants which will help them secure payment for the use of their rental units. This bill prohibits a political subdivision from enacting any ordinance which may restrict certain conduct of landlords. Specifically, they may not limit how far back in time a landlord may look at a renter’s credit, criminal history or previous housing. Furthermore this bill provides that a political subdivision may not enact an ordinance which would prohibit a landlord from obtaining or using income, occupation, rental history, or court information to determine a renter’s applicability.

“Giving property owners the flexibility to check for criminal history and credit history on individuals they allow to reside in their housing units is ultimately about strengthening property rights,” said Governor Walker.

Senate Bill 136: Under current law, a seller of residential properties is required to provide to prospective buyers a form that discloses various information about the condition of the property and related matters that could influence a decision to buy the property. This bill creates a vacant land disclosure report, similar to the residential condition report, on which the owner must disclose certain conditions of the property of which he or she is aware. Those conditions include things like, underground storage tanks on the property, any significant odor, noise or water intrusion on the property or coming from the neighboring properties, and if the property is connected to electricity, cable, water/sewer, telephone service or natural gas.

“Proper disclosure is important to ensuring fair and equitable property transactions,” said Governor Walker.  “I would like to thank State Senator Dale Schultz and Representative Steineke for providing leadership on this issue.” 

Senate Bill 151 (Cowles/Weininger): Current law specifically excludes from the definition of a lottery, situations in which an employee refers a person to the employee’s employer to purchase goods or services, but only if the employee does not receive compensation for the referral. Under this bill, such referrals are not considered participation in a lottery regardless of whether the employee receives any compensation.

Senate Bill 196 (Olsen/Petrowski): Under current law, the Department of Revenue provides Wisconsin municipalities general aid payments through an Expenditure Restraint Program. Municipalities qualify for general aid funding if its property tax levy rate is greater than five mills and if its budget did not increase by more than a specified rate. Under this bill, expenditures made by a municipality on behalf of a school district are excluded from calculating the municipality’s budget figure. By excluding these payments from the budget calculation, more municipalities will qualify for the expenditure restraint program, gain additional funds and be able to maintain core services without raising local tax rates.

Senate Bill 208 (Grothman/Endsley): Under current law, no child under the age of eight years may be transported in a motor vehicle unless the child is properly restrained in a car seat (child safety restraint system) or booster seat. The type of restraint system required depends on the age and size of the child. The current statute language technically prohibits parents from using a more protective restraint system if the child fits into another category due to their age or weight. The law was never intended to prohibit parents from choosing to more securely transport their children in the car. This legislation rectifies that problem by clarifying that a child may be transported in a more protective category of restraint system than the minimum required by law.

Senate Bill 217 (Lasee/Petrowski): Under current law, the Department of Transportation must suspend the operating privileges and vehicle registrations of anyone that has an outstanding judgment of $500 or more arising from damages caused by a motor vehicle accident. This legislation changes the requirements to have driving and registration privileges reinstated. In order for reinstatement two things must happen: the judgment must either be stayed, satisfied or discharged or five years must have elapsed from the initial judgment date (whichever is earlier) and at least three years must elapse, unless the person can provide and maintain proof of financial responsibility before that time. 

Senate Bill 241 (Lasee/Rivard): Under current law, a person’s time interest in a time share estate may be foreclosed in a court proceeding in the same manner as an interest in a real property is foreclosed. This legislation sets out nonjudicial or administrative procedures for foreclosing interests in and assessment liens against time share estates and licenses. The bill provides that individuals seeking to foreclose their interest on a time share estate or time share license must use the administrative procedure. If the owner of a time share estate objects to the administrative procedure, the foreclosing entity must go through the judicial process.

Senate Bill 253 (Galloway/Petrowski): The Voluntary Party Liability Exemption (VPLE) is a program provided through the Department of Natural Resources. It is a voluntary process whereby a person can perform an investigation and cleanup of a contaminated property while being exempt from liability. The program has been very successful in helping businesses and local governments cleanup and redevelop abandoned, idle or underused commercial or industrial properties where the expansion may be hindered by potential contamination. Under current law, the VPLE is not available for landfills that are licensed by the DNR. This bill expands the VPLE so that it is available for any landfill that was licensed by the DNR before May 1975.

Assembly Bill 63 (Wynn/Grothman): This legislation changes current state statute with regard to businesses operating under a Class A liquor license. This bill changes the morning closing hours for retailers from 8:00am to 6:00am. This bill does not change the closing hours for the sale of liquor. Meaning, a retailer selling beer can do so lawfully from 6:00am to midnight and a retailer selling intoxicating liquor or wine can do so lawfully from 6:00am to 9:00pm. This legislation also retains current power of municipalities, allowing them to alter these hours by ordinance if they choose.

Related Topics: Castle Doctrine, Governor Scott Walker, and new laws

patchreader 123

12:39 pm on Saturday, December 10, 2011

Thanks, H.A.

I was hoping Patch would post and summarize the bills - and you did.

Reply
Comment_arrow
Patch_comments_icon

Heather Asiyanbi

8:29 am on Sunday, December 11, 2011

@patchreader 123 - thanks! I'm on the Governor's media list (finally!) so I can do this now whenever I get the news.

mau

1:00 pm on Saturday, December 10, 2011

Thank you Heather. Great service.

Reply

James R Hoffa

2:02 pm on Saturday, December 10, 2011

OK, everything looks pretty good here with the exception of the following:

Special Session Senate Bill 12 – Instead of arbitrarily capping attorney fees at 3x the amount of compensatory damages successfully recovered, the same judicial review standards required on other attorney fee awards by the bill should also be applied to compensatory damages where the ultimate amount of such an award is left to the discretion of the sitting trial judge on the case. An arbitrary fee cap will have a chilling effect on many cases involving property damage or contract for services breaches where the value of such property/damage/services performed are difficult to objectively determine. Or, if they really wanted to fix not only excessive fees but also frivolous filings, we could just adopt the ‘loser pays all attorney fees’ system that the UK uses. I give them an ‘F’ on this one!

Senate Bill 107 – I have mixed feelings on this one and think that a better or fairer resolution would have possible as opposed to the enacted legislation. Like permitting the landlord to collect a higher security deposit from someone with an old/outdated strike on their record as opposed to allowing it to be grounds for outright denial, which could contribute to unfair discrimination premised upon the faulty assumption that people never change for the better.

Reply
Comment_arrow

James R Hoffa

2:03 pm on Saturday, December 10, 2011

Senate Bill 217 – This bill lets a person off the hook for damaging another’s property and not paying restitution in an adequate time frame. Instead, keep the current law as it is and even drop the $500 minimum threshold, whereby you would only get your driving and registration privileges restored after having FULLY paid all restitution to the injured party. Personal responsibility!

Senate Bill 241 – Why force timeshare interest foreclosures into the administrative arena? Unless it’s to take an already overwhelming foreclosure burden off the court system? I’m just questioning the sense of this one, as the opt out provision for the timeshare interest owner makes me think that administrative hearings would rarely happen anyway, and even then only in cases of uncontested default which really don’t overly burden the court system anyway. There must be some reason behind this, but what that reason is escapes me at the moment.

Assembly Bill 63 – I’m more or so indifferent to this one as opposed to having any particular problem with it. I guess I’m just trying to understand if this was really a necessary change that we needed to focus our time, efforts, and resources on as opposed to other more important and pressing matters.

And that’s the Hoffa assessment boys and girls!

Comment_arrow

T Van Parys

11:31 am on Tuesday, December 13, 2011

Ditto on SB 217 - why should criminals get their license back simply by "waiting out" the victims. Very disappointed in this one.

Lyle Ruble

2:12 pm on Saturday, December 10, 2011

What a waste of a special session that was to address creating more jobs. All this session did was create more statutes for solidifying the rights pet legislation. Count this session as a total failure.

Reply
Comment_arrow

James R Hoffa

3:02 pm on Saturday, December 10, 2011

@Lyle -

So why didn't the Dems push their "Make Wisconsin Work" jobs package during the session? Maybe because it was little more than a restore the state funding cut from the Technical Colleges and the UW-System earlier this year, taxpayer funded handout (grants) program for temporary state jobs, increased farm subsidies in an attempt to court the rural vote to the Party and recall effort, and significant across the board tax increases bill disguised as a ‘jobs’ bill?

Wanggaard just introduced a REAL jobs bill initiative last week that makes pretty good sense and wouldn't cost us anything more than what we're already spending. Genius!

Also, if the Capitol protests/occupations, the Dems fleeing to IL for nearly a month, frivolous lawsuits being filed purposefully in front of liberal Dane Co activist judges, senatorial recall efforts and elections, and now the Walker and additional senatorial recall efforts, on top of other things, hadn’t significantly slowed down the budget matters, which had to be addressed before anything else fiscally substantive could be done, maybe they would have gotten to the jobs programs already and we’d be reaping the fruits of such programs by now. But alas, the libs wouldn’t allow that to happen.

Comment_arrow

James R Hoffa

3:02 pm on Saturday, December 10, 2011

Coincidence that the state was actually gaining jobs and didn’t start losing jobs until after the senatorial recall elections and all the hoopla of wanting to recall Walker? I don’t think so. Not to mention the union boycotts, etc? The political instability caused by all of these antics creates the perception of an unstable market place, which greatly erodes the confidence and certainty necessary to create new or expand existing businesses within the state. You want job creation, then get the left to knock off their temper tantrum already!

Comment_arrow

Lyle Ruble

3:37 pm on Saturday, December 10, 2011

@JRH...James, James, James; get up to my speed my friend. When the legislature adjourned, all the Democratic bills were still on the table and the leadership of the two chambers refused to take them up.

I like the fact that you threw out the red herring of the Senate abdicating to IL. Clever, but meaningless at this point. I am curious how you're connecting the recalls with job loss. I would be curious if you would connect the dots for me.

Comment_arrow

James R Hoffa

4:10 pm on Saturday, December 10, 2011

@Lyle -

If the Democratic bills are still on the table, then they haven't been quashed, right? How does the old saying go - good things come to those who wait! As long as Walker stays at the helm, then you can get ready for the tsunami of job growth that the state will experience over the remainder of his term. I just hope you have your floaties ready for the wave!

The only thing I have to connect the dots for you is a dose of common sense. If you were a business looking to move or expand in Wisconsin and wanted to take advantage of some of Walker’s programs to do so, would you given the very real, possible, and potential threat of a union boycott against your business just for having any kind of connection to Walker or his policies, not to mention isolating and detracting 40% or more of your potential customer base right of the bat? And with the non-stop recalls, who's to say that some of those programs couldn’t be retroactively undone and your taxes raised in the near future by the left were they to be successful in gaining power and control? All of a sudden, you’re stuck wishing you had went to one of the Carolinas or Texas with your business instead. That’s just a reality of the situation that has been created by the left.

Comment_arrow

Lyle Ruble

4:48 pm on Saturday, December 10, 2011

@JRH...I honestly don't think it is the threat of turning the clock back as much as it is that we haven't struck the right chord. I still maintain that we should be concentrating on new domestic job creation rather than attempting to attract out of state business to come in. It would be cheaper in the long run to develop new business rather than attracting established businesses. One of the things that I think many overlooked when Walker closed high speed rail was that Talgo left. Now the problem was that it was knew business and technology that would have spurred on other innovation by either creating a supply chains to support their production or spin offs to compete with them.

My problem is what is going to take the place of Walker's program if he loses the recall? It's not working, but what would work? I don't have the answer yet and my individual vote will depend on it. We can't turn the clock back to October of 2010, so we have to have an alternative plan to not only take us in the right direction, but it must be able to make up for lost time that we incurred walking down the path that Walker has gone.

Comment_arrow

James R Hoffa

5:26 pm on Saturday, December 10, 2011

@Lyle –

“I still maintain that we should be concentrating on new domestic job creation rather than attempting to attract out of state business to come in.”

The more dystopian our culture becomes, the harder that is going to be. Just look at how a good majority of the Hollywood films released over the last decade have been re-makings of old ideas in some form or anther or based on novels that also present recycled themes. As a society, we’re losing our creativity and imagination and haven’t actually created anything new in quite some time in my honest opinion. But I suppose that your answer for this would be to spur another drug fueled decade of liberalism and decadence, such as the ‘60’s were, right?

“…but it must be able to make up for lost time that we incurred walking down the path that Walker has gone.”

In all honesty, have you given Walker’s path a fair opportunity to work? We’ve had to endure three years of Obama and are still waiting for his path (the Keynesian economics that you’ve so openly endorsed in the past) to fruition into concrete positive results. Doesn’t Walker deserve a little more time and a fair chance as well?

Comment_arrow

mau

12:56 pm on Sunday, December 11, 2011

Talgo hasn't left. They are still under contract through Doyle's deal. Wish I could find the article I read the other day that talked about Spain setting themselves up to take advantage of the US tax dollars stimulus money.

Here is the problem and it involves both parties. We have unfair International Trade Agreements that were signed by Democrat presidents. Both parties are to blame for our situation. http://investigativereportingworkshop.org/investigations/wind-energy-funds-going-overseas/story/powerful-democrats-help-chinese-e/ Walker is a little clog in a big wheel. I'll beat you to it, not the Koch wheel. Doyle had his sweet deals with the Indians and Spain. I can't recall how many countries he made "trade missions" to. Any time this country signs treaties or trade agreements, our legislature has to enact laws and regulations to abide by them. All the finger pointing at one party or another is all eye wash. They have to be passed. Problem is these agreements are never to our advantage.

Do some reading and see who controls the ports in California, who the legislatures State and Federal who have their finger in the cookie jar.

At this point Wisconsin should welcome any jobs. Thing is jobs come and jobs go no matter who the Governor is.

Comment_arrow

James R Hoffa

1:13 pm on Sunday, December 11, 2011

@mau -

Great assessment here! Both Lyle and I wholeheartedly agree with you on the unfair trade imbalances that our politicians on both sides of the aisle have sold us out on, as this problem has been a frequent topic of conversation in the past on other boards!

Keep up the good fight my friend!

Comment_arrow

Brian Dey

5:52 pm on Monday, December 12, 2011

Lyle, Lyle, Lyle. You do realize that jobs were being created faster in Wisconsin up until the recall talk started in June. Business owners are not going to commit resources to development and expansion if the think that there is a possibility that Wisconsin will be "Closed for Business" again. And the legislature is not going to enact any new major legislature in this toxic political environment when anything that makes good fiscal sense is seen by the recallers as new ammunition.

It is refreshing to see that property taxes are going down in the municipalities and school districts that didn't rush to extend contracts. It's also great to see that the more and more people get their new tax bills, and didn't see negative affects to their schools, that they are no longer rushing to sign recall petitions.

It's the unions worst nightmare. People are actually seeing the positives in Act 10 and have opened their eyes to the facts of the personal affects to their lives.

Comment_arrow

Lyle Ruble

7:06 pm on Monday, December 12, 2011

@Brian Dey...Nothing to connect recalls with job loss, nice attempt to spin though. I really don't know about the taxes yet since the information is not all in.

As far as passing legislation in the "toxic political environment", why meet at all if you not going to address jobs legislation, which was the reason for the special session called for by the governor. Still a failure.

Comment_arrow

Brian Dey

7:30 pm on Monday, December 12, 2011

Surely Lyle, as a former small business owner, yu know the importance of short-range and long-range forecasts and strategies. If you don't know the rules and you are a compnay on the bubble, you are going to probably stand pat until you know the rules.

I know, that under the current rules, for the first time in eight years, I am looking at expansion. Expansion, in the service industries, means two things. Expanding our client base, and hiring more employees. Now, do I make that decision in the present, or do I wait to see if the rules are going to change in a couple of months. If the rules do change, that affects my short and long term forecasts, which in turn, affects mine and my stockholders financial bottomline.

We are not going to hedge our bets, especially in a fragile economy, and will hold tight until an outcome is resolute. Many corporate boards will do the same, hence growth or expansion, slows down. That does hold down hiring, and limits expansion.

I, like most CEO's, are not gamblers by nature. And when you have a situation of instablitity and unpredictability, we are going to be extemely cautious.

As far as your assessment of failure, I'm pretty sure the changes made by Walker and the legislature have matched or exceeded their desired outcomes. I believe you would be hard-pressed to provide contrary evidence. The desired outcome was stable taxes or lower taxes, a balanced budget with little or no loss of service. All have been exceeded.

Comment_arrow

Lyle Ruble

8:39 am on Tuesday, December 13, 2011

@Brian Dey...I fully understand your business strategy and your reluctance to invest in expansion of your business. However, please recognise that this is only one strategy amongst many. Much of it has to do the industry your business is involved with and whether you are involved in service or manufacturing. The manufacturer is at greatest risk because of the manufacturing process. Ramping up logistic chains takes time and captial let alone manufacturing time. Service companies, on the hand are much more flexible and can respond more quickly to changing conditions.

Much of success is based on being able to predict the future. There is a bit of gambler in all successful enterprises. Your real argument is that the political envirionment is necessary for predicting the probability of success or failure. It is uncertaintity that is the problem. Now the question, if the recall is successful at some level, what does that do to uncertainty? One way or the other certainty will be finally answered by the recall. It will either return as before Walker or it will retain the changes made. In any case we are not talking years to determine the course of action but months. Now if your forecasts and plans are dependent somehow on the new Walker programs, you will have to change and reevaluate. But, I as a business man would have already done this so my business would not be putting all my eggs in one basket.

mau

2:23 pm on Saturday, December 10, 2011

Thanks to Heather we now see what a session of legislation looks like. First, on my part, this is the first time I have seen a report like this. Second, I can't critique whether it was a waste or not as I have never seen a similar report to compare it to, on any other sessions.

A couple weeks ago I was looking for such a report about the legislation that Gov. Walker signed into law here in Racine. Neither the Journal Times or Milwaukee Journal Sentinel gave a listing of the legislation like Heather has. But luckily I did find such a report in a little local town newspaper published in Loyal Wisconsin.

Reply
Comment_arrow
Patch_comments_icon

Heather Asiyanbi

8:32 am on Sunday, December 11, 2011

@mau - thanks! I can't take all the credit because the Governor's office did the legwork by putting the list together, but I do want to be sure that I get the news out there when they send it to me.

James R Hoffa

2:42 pm on Saturday, December 10, 2011

Definitely a great job of reporting by Patch's own Heather Asiyanbi!

Our appreciation goes out to you :-)

Reply

Michael Muskovitz

3:17 pm on Saturday, December 10, 2011

All in all I think Scott Walker is getting the job done as he said he would. There are a few small flaws that will be ironed out in time - just as all new bills have. The cobwebs will be removed and a better structure put in place after further review. Still I TGFSW

Reply

Heather in Caledonia

8:17 am on Sunday, December 11, 2011

Thank you for reporting on this, Heather!

Reply

Gregory Kluck

9:27 am on Sunday, December 11, 2011

Kudos to Ms. Asiyanbi for taking on this reporting.

Reply

Phil Scarr

11:24 am on Sunday, December 11, 2011

Ahh, the laser focus on jobs. Well done, Republicans! Well done!

http://bit.ly/sAu5h7

Reply
Comment_arrow

James R Hoffa

12:52 pm on Sunday, December 11, 2011

@Phil Scarr -

You must have missed Wanggaard's jobs bill or the iron ore mining bill that were just both introduced last week that really are 'jobs' bills and wouldn’t cost us anymore money than what we're already currently spending to create long-term private sector jobs. And no tax increases necessary – go figure, eh?

Contrast with the Democrats' "Make Wisconsin Work" package of so-called 'jobs' bills, which is nothing more than a thinly disguised restoration of the state funding that was cut from the UW and Technical College systems earlier this year, a taxpayer funded handout (grants) program for temporary state infrastructure project workers (that aren’t actually needed to perform those infrastructure projects but would just be an extra man collecting a check for the sake of collecting a check), increased farm subsidies in an attempt to court the rural vote to the Party and recall effort, and significant across the board tax increases (not just for the rich, but also hearty increases on the middle class as this would be the only way to pay for all of this without blowing the balanced budget) bill disguised as a ‘jobs’ bill.

Yeah, Wanggaard's and the Republicans' approach is the obvious better solution of the two unless you’re using some sort of narcotic.

Wait a minute, didn’t you admit in the past on another board that you were in fact a “paid Obama agitator and union stooge?” I seem to recall that you did.

Nice try Phil, but try again!

Bren

4:29 pm on Sunday, December 11, 2011

More legislation to help rich people avoid accountability. Thanks to Patch for providing a roadmap for rollback when the appropriate time comes.

Reply
Comment_arrow

James R Hoffa

12:06 am on Monday, December 12, 2011

@Bren -

Did you even read the summaries provided before posting your comment? Of the bills summarized here, please tell us which ones specifically only apply to "help rich people avoid accountability," how exactly they do this, and why they would only ever apply to just rich people.

If you can't do this, then please just admit that you are nothing more than the partisan hack that you truly are! After all, even Phil Scarr previously admitted that he was nothing more than a “paid Obama agitator and union stooge.” If Phil is comfortable with and can actually tell us the truth, then so can you.

Word!

Comment_arrow

Bren

6:03 pm on Monday, December 12, 2011

Hi Mr. Hoffa; a number of the items are superfluous (i.e., my tax dollars would have been better spent if they had been working on job creation), and others, well, are a roadmap. We'll see what happens.

patchreader 123

6:48 pm on Monday, December 12, 2011

I urge people to read up on this, as well as the underlying, mis-directed "Citizens United" Supreme Court decision, and realize all that is undermining the voting power of the common, every-day citizens of this fine country.

http://www.jsonline.com/news/statepolitics/us-appeals-court-strikes-down-part-of-state-election-law-0f3dodh-135467578.html

It's sad that the only presidential candidate having the courage to address the issue is the "never-mentioned" Buddy Roemer out of Louisiana.

Sadder still in the fact that the only press that Buddy Roemer gets is via an editorial from the Cap Times out of Madison.

http://host.madison.com/ct/news/opinion/editorial/the-serious-republican-candidate-for-president/article_c3d1cd3c-914a-5e46-86ae-e5dc02251734.html

Reply

Leave a comment