Royse Myers: Battling Urban Sprawl In Caledonia With 25,000 Trees
For years this former businessman has been telling the world to keep out by planting 25,000 trees on more than 220 acres. But Ron Coutts, the Village president, says his investment has come at a cost to the Village by rendering the land undevelopable.
Want to read more about this topic? "Like" this story on Facebook by clicking on the "like" link above this story. If we get more than 10 "likes," we'll know to do a follow-up story.
Standing at the edge of his no-name lake, his thin canvas zip-front jacket draped on a tree, it’s easy to see Royse Myers as a folksy, grandfather-like custodian of Caledonia.
Put a picket sign in his hand, as he did when Wal-Mart came courting, and the picture changes to more of a militant in a Mr. Rogers sweater.
“I’m not happy with what’s happening in the world,” Myers, 81, said. “People bulldoze everything in sight. They cut trees down faster than I can replace them. It’s my way more than anything of saying, ‘I’m going to fight you as best I can with my limited resources and my limited property.”
Taking A Stance On Land Use
That property spans more than 220 acres, an area more than a mile square, bound not only by its contiguous placement on a map but also by a system of conservation easements, which prevent development on all but a thin sliver of land around the Myers’ home.
Unlike some protected lands, the collective acreage is not a public park; for nearly 25 years, Myers and his wife, Barbara, have lived quietly, raising three children and welcoming seven grandchildren to the remodeled home at the end of their remote, gated and camera-guarded driveway.
“Basically, we’re just telling the world to stay away,” Myers said.
He’s protective because his land is a place where ducks and geese carry in fish eggs on their feet, naturally restocking a 30-acre lake carved from a once-abandoned quarry.
It’s a place where Myers has planted an estimated 25,000 trees.
And, with legal protections that ban development on the property, it’s a place that instantly springs to mind in the local debate about green space in Caledonia.
“There’s a running battle, I guess, between generating money for the village and protecting the environment,” Myers said. “And the two seem to be not compatible at all times. We’re trying to live in harmony with the village and pay our fair share.”
And he wants to pay his fair share.
Before he sold it in 1999, Myers ran a 300-employee company that made industrial coolers. As a business man, he understands the growing divide between the services a community provides and the community’s ability to pay for those services.
“If you fly from Chicago to Milwaukee, Caledonia is the only remaining green space of any significance. We’re trying to preserve that,” Myers said.
“Unfortunately, that minimizes the amount of tax money available to the village. And they’re unfortunately fighting the budget all the time and looking for ways to make money.”
That doesn’t mean the Myers were exactly apologetic when they asked the village to assess their land based on what they see as its true value, not the potential buildable value traditionally used to gauge property taxes.
“Our family has given up a lot of money by getting the conservation easements,” Barbara Myers, 80, said. “Is the village losing anything? No, I don’t think so.
Especially since they have given up building rights on all but two of their 230 acres -- a kind of insurance policy to make sure the land could one day be sold, since Royse and Barbara are sure their children won’t be able to keep the property once they are gone.
Even with a hard won 25 percent decrease, Myers said, “they could never afford the taxes.” Myers said.
So, on two acres – and those two acres alone – a new owner could remodel the house or build a new one, even McMansion.
Myers shuddered at the thought. But it’s a risk worth taking if the property is preserved.
“This is our legacy,” he said.
Preserving Caledonia's Rural Character
Barbara and Royse are not alone in wanting to preserve green space in Caledonia.
Sandy DeWalt, a board member of the Caledonia Conservancy, absolutely believes the community wins when people place conservation easements on their land. It’s a principle that has led the conservancy to acquire about 170 acres in the village with plans to add another 20 within the next couple of months.
“All our land is open to the public from dawn to dusk. When there is very little money, we provide places for people to go at no cost,” she said.
“Yes, we’re taking things off the tax rolls,” DeWalt said. “But we’re providing function for the community in forms of walking trails, riding trails, cross-country skiing. I understand we need development. I pay taxes. I live in Caledonia. But it’s keeping the development where things are already developed.”
“I think that what Royse and Barbara are doing is admirable,” DeWalt said. “They have preserved land and are trying to put back what was lost. Royse is reforesting the area and bringing it back to as close to the natural state as he can. If we had more Royses around, I think we could have the best of both worlds.”
Taking The Land Out Of The Loop For Business
Village President Ron Coutts isn’t quite as unabashedly enthusiastic about green space conservation, although he acknowledged that such protections have been and continue to be important to the character of Caledonia.
“At one time, yes, I was a big supporter,” Coutts said. “But, right now, we’ve got enough land set aside. How much more do you want? How much more land do we take off the tax rolls?”
“It’s tough in Caledonia,” he added. “I’ve put 20 budgets together in my time on the board. This one was the toughest to find money to keep our head above water. We almost had to cut out paint for striping the roads. We need these Wal-Marts, whether you like them or not. We need them. We need development. If we don’t see development taking place, I think we’ll be in a world of hurt.”
Coutts said he feels many local land conservationists don’t appreciate that big picture, which means that, at least for now, their goals might be mutually exclusive.
“When I see a developer come for Caledonia, my arms will be open. I’ll fight the Conservancy,” Coutts said. “It would be nice to work together, but I don’t think that will happen.”
Royse and Barbara don’t expect the debate to blow over any time soon. They even understand that issues of financial solvency in the village might, for many people, trump any dreams of land preservation.
For now, they are comforted knowing they have done what they can -- and will continue to do as long as their resources hold out.
“This is our legacy,” Royse Myers said. “Something people can remember us by.”
“It makes you feel like you’re leaving something good after you’re gone,” Barbara added. “We hope other people will do what they can.”
Heather in Caledonia
4:08 pm on Tuesday, November 8, 2011
This is his land and I think he should be allowed to do with it as he sees fit. I personally like that he's planting trees as I enjoy living in an area with both semi-urban and rural places. It does make it hard to fund gov't, but if this land isn't being developed on, no services will need to be used for it, correct? Maybe running sewer through it to get somewhere else or help with drainage - he should be responsible for paying for things like that. I also don't see a problem with the Conservancy buying land that shouldn't be developed in the first place (too swampy, etc.) As for Wal-Marts, why are we always talking about adding retail stores? How much shopping can we do, anyway? What about attracting offices or light manufacturing? We have enough areas set aside for that type of development that we should be fine with folks putting their own properties in conservation trusts.
ms
8:13 pm on Tuesday, November 8, 2011
Heather, you are right, he can do whatever he wants, it's his land. If he wants to plant trees or build a WalMart he can do whatever he wants with his land. I don't understand why you don't think he should pay his fair share of taxes. If I have a house valued at $1M and you have one valued at $100,000 and we each require the same services you're saying we should pay the same tax. Looks like you want to tax each person instead of property value.
Heather in Caledonia
9:29 pm on Tuesday, November 8, 2011
ms, That's interesting... I was just thinking about the way property taxes work against property improvement this evening. Fixing up your home so it's not a piece of trash, remodeling a business so it looks nicer, etc. all require you to pay more in taxes, so it discourages people making improvements on their property. (Or at least telling the gov't about the improvements they make that no one can see from the outside. :))
Now, as for your interpretation of my argument, I'm confused. I don't follow your train of thought. You say that I don't think he should pay much in taxes because there is no development on his property - so, he's really just paying taxes on the land. Then, you said I think everyone should be paying the same whether they have a $1 million home or a $100,000 home. We currently tax at the rate of what is developed on the property along with the land itself, right? So.... if the property is not developed, it shouldn't be taxed as much as a property that is, right? From the article, it sounds like he was being taxed on what COULD be developed on his property and he didn't want to pay for what was not there (and won't be in the foreseeable future.) Makes sense to me. Not sure exactly where I stand on the taxing for property value thing, though... I can see the pros and cons on both sides.
Caledonia Confused
12:11 am on Wednesday, November 9, 2011
Talk about confusing. My head hurts!
Neighborhood Plan for the Tabor Woods Neighborhood (C3):
On page 8 of the has the land zoned as residential.
On page 11 the land use is a mix of "Residential Low Density" and "Natural Areas / Environmental Corridor".
On page 12 there is a "Red Triangle" that designates "Proposed Park".
Land Use Plan
On page 2 the Land Use Plan Map shows the land as Country Side East (CE) that allows Open Space and Park or Agricultural according to the table on page 7.
On page 3 the Land Use Conditions Map has a portion of the land listed as "Environmental Corridors" and the "Yellow Asterisk" for "Proposed Park".
On page 4 the Zoning Classifications Map has the land listed as "R-3","R-4", and "R-7".
Racine County Zoning
R-1 Country Estate District
R-4 Urban Residential District I
R-7 Multifamily Residential District
Caledonia Confused
12:18 am on Wednesday, November 9, 2011
Sorry should have listed
R-3 Suburban Residential District (Sewered)
Heather in Caledonia
8:10 am on Wednesday, November 9, 2011
Oh, thanks. :) Now my head hurts....
Sheila Bielefeldt
12:32 pm on Wednesday, November 9, 2011
It is nice to know how Coutts feels about attracting any type of business, just to increase the tax base. He will not get my vote again in the future. I guess certain people will not be happy until Racine and Oak Creek are joined together by big box stores.
Brian Dey
4:24 pm on Wednesday, November 9, 2011
Well, Mr. Myers is obviously a rich man, you know, being the leader of an evil corporation. He should be taxed higher so those of us that don't have his wealth that he probably didn't earn, can pay less. That is the problem with the liberal agenda. They pick and choose the winners as long as it follows their personal agenda. Coutts is absolutely right. If you want to keep Caledonia this bastian of greenspace, then put your money where your mouth is. If not,then keep it closed and be thankful that NOT ONE trustee wants to pave over Caledonia (and the record speaks for itself), but understand that a balance has to be struck, and from attending years of meetings and serving our village in various capacities, I have found the board to be sincere in striking a BALANCE.
Caledonia Confused
11:06 pm on Wednesday, November 9, 2011
I was just thinking. Would the village give me a property tax break? I have utility "easements" that I can't even plant trees on!
ms
6:43 pm on Thursday, November 10, 2011
Does any one know how many police officers were let go as a result of Mr Meyer's reduced taxes and the conservancy's lands not paying any tax. Patchreader, have you figured this out?
Frances Martin
8:10 pm on Sunday, December 16, 2012
ms--are you(and Ron Coutts) equally worried about the the churches and moose/elk/.opossum/whatever lodges that don't pay taxes, but DO require village services, or is it just open space and trees that add to everyone's quality of life that have you concerned?
Ron Coutts doesn't seem to have read the report that was commissioned and paid for under his leadership, that concluded that big box stores are a net loss to the village. I guess his motto might be "Don't confuse me with the facts".
Brian Dey
8:23 pm on Sunday, December 16, 2012
Fran- So are you saying that only open space adds to quality of life? I think churches and civic organizations do as well. I am a member of the Moose and they are a very charitable orgainization. I also go to church. I'm offended that you would attack Ron Coutts about Walmart on this very old blog. But I still don't see how the pony club on Hwy. 31 should be tax exempt. Heck, my house adds to my quality of life so why is it taxed? Fran, maybe you should run because we all know how factual you are.
ms
9:23 pm on Sunday, December 16, 2012
Fran, how do the trees on his land add to my quality of life. Land that I can never walk on. Land that I can never use to enjoy nature. It's private land. Pay your taxes.
Also, please go read the report the paid for by the village. No where in the report does it conclude that big box stores are a net loss. It does state that they contribute somewhat less than other ommercial development. The proposal does include 5 commercial buildings in addition to the big box store so would these just be a bonus? I think you need to get your facts straight.
KEEP ON KEEPING ON
8:22 am on Monday, December 17, 2012
This article illustrates in a public forum that Mr. Coutt's recent statements about listening to both sides and the concerns of the community is skewed by the fact he feels "We need Wal-Marts". Second, it's 3, not 5 outlots for future development. The outlots on the West are the supposed buffer for homes right across the road. Finally, if you want to talk taxes, let's take a reasonable estimate of the assessed value of the proposed WM in today's market at 13 million. Being in district 719, the mill rate in 21.64/M. Take that total and 27%, or about $76,000 comes to the Village. Oh, but wait. Now we need to improve the roads. No, not WM's offer for curbs and traffic lights. They are not paying to widen roads, to improve a Class B road that cannot hold semi weight. Nor will they upkeep. What about sewers? What about hiring more police officers? There goes the revenue. That is what the 2011 Ehlers study pointed out in regards to Big Box development All so WM, who has been unable to secure a commercial lot with existing infrastructure, can manipulate our zoning and Land Use Plan for their own desires. Where is the potential in that location to build a commercial corridor? Where can other business build? This is NOT comparable the current WM on Hwy 11. It's more like putting a WM on Washington and West. With the exception of PNS and K-mart, the business that will be effected are small and local. There goes their tax revenue and jobs. IT DOES NOT BELONG THERE!
rudi wendt
4:26 am on Friday, November 11, 2011
I commend Mr.Myers for planting all those trees.Somebody has to clean the air WE is polluting.Is there something wrong with this picture?WE can expand,pollute the air,and pollute the water,destroy a neighborhood but,do not dare plant any trees.It is private property and I can not see anything wrong with nature,do you?Then move to the city.
m d
10:17 pm on Sunday, November 13, 2011
We-Energies is a good neighbor and is doing more than it needs to in ordere to keep our air, water and land enviromentally sound
KEEP ON KEEPING ON
9:03 am on Monday, December 17, 2012
And this rabid need to have more revenue, more revenue!!! Is WM the only answer there is? Have we done ANYTHING towards investing in our commercial corridor. This same corridor WM asserts they belong in? They will sit at the corner of 2 residential roads while Douglas sits and does nothing?? All the wonderful business WM will attract is going where? To the West? North? South? On top of Calstar??
We passed a balanced Village Budget in 7 minutes! And people want to vilify a man for creating a conservancy? Because we can't gobble up revenue from it? And land by I-94 sits and waits? Talk about "under-utilized" as WM claims the parcels on NGB and 4 mile are. We have a County level and Village level Land Use Plan that calls for medium to hight density residential at that location. A small office building or bank type business would logically fit into the Plan as well. If we allow WM to rezone, that new zoning stands in direct conflict with the current Plans. Oh, but they assert because the parcel is part of the "Village Center" it belongs there. Yeah, I see the new WM in Greendale was put in the middle of their "Center". No, it was put on 76th street, WHERE IT BELONGS!!
Living Up to a Higher Standard
4:41 pm on Monday, December 17, 2012
I agree with Keep On Keeping On: Is WM the only answer to generate more revenue? If Caledonia wants WM to add to its tax revenue base, put it further west, toward the interstate. WM brings with it a different economic and social quality to our area, including high traffic, non-stop noise/chaos, and will pull sales away from the existing businesses. Aren't there enough Wal-Mart's in our area? Really! K-Mart has struggled to stay in business. Does anyone really think putting a WM in direct competition with the already existing businesses in our area will benefit any of us that live and/or do business in the area? I've seen enough of what WM has to offer, from family members that work there, to century-old family businesses that have been squashed by WM's business (lack of) ethics. As a Village, other tax revenue generating avenues should be pursued, rather than prostituting Caledonia to WM.