patching...
Update: Have an announcement or event you want to promote? We've got a tool for that.
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!
Local Voices
The Death of Truth

At Least He is Still Pretty

With the first debate over with what have we learned about our current President. 

 

1)  $5 Trillion + $2 Trillion = $7 Trillion.  No matter where those numbers came from or if they have any basis in political reality; we now know as a country how to add numbers that includes twelve zeros.  Otherwise referred to as arithmetic.  However, the same mathematical rules don’t apply when establishing the fact that $90 billion is way more the $2.8 billion.

2)  Subsidizes are only bad when they are not authorized by Obama.

3)  It has been 4 years since was Obama put in charge of the country, but nothing that has happened between then and now that can be used to determine the President's ability to lead.

4)  Obama did not find Romney romantic.

5)  Obama enjoys the idea of trickle down government.

6)  There is a mythical tax credit if you move your business over seas.

7)  Obamacare is now a term of endearment to the President.  From this point forward all Obama policy will carry his name as a sign of respect.  Obamagration, O-deficit, The Keystone Obamaline, Dodd Barrack - Obama Frank Financial Reform and of course Barrack and Furious.

8)  Jim Lehrer is a racist and tried to silence the President by cutting him off 5 seconds early.

9)  Obamacare cannot limit medical treatment; however, it does institutes an unelected board that can set the prices for procedures at a level that makes hospitals and doctors unwilling to perform them if the board deems it necessary to ration care. 

10) The teleprompter is brains behind our current President.

 

Romney/Ryan 2012

Randy1949

3:59 pm on Thursday, October 4, 2012

"2) Subsidizes are only bad when they are not authorized by Obama."

I think you mean 'subsidies' J.B. And, of course, they're only good when they help agribusinesses and oil companies.

Reply
Comment_arrow

J. B. Schmidt

4:22 pm on Thursday, October 4, 2012

@Randy
My bad. I can't always be perfect.

I am completely against all farm subsidies. They more then anything have destroyed the family farm. As for Oil, Romney stated it best.

Comment_arrow

Jay Sykes

6:11 am on Friday, October 5, 2012

A tax break, or a tax cut, is a reduction in the tax revenues collected. A subsidy, however, is money given to an individual or business for a specific purpose.

In mining and the oil business they use the depletion allowance, it is is a tax break, not a subsidy. It is very similar to the deprecation allowance used for other major business assets.

Many in our government intentionally mix the concepts of tax break and subsidy to 'service'(read:prostitute) their own purpose, and ultimately to all our of disadvantage too

To understand the differences between tax breaks subsides and people should read John Locke’s Two Treatises of Government.

Comment_arrow

mau

2:36 pm on Friday, October 5, 2012

Kohl and Feingold were big supporters of agribusiness.

Obama continues to support oil companies by waging war in the Middle East.

Obama appoints Monsanto employees Into government position in particular assignments in charge of our food.

H.E. Pennypacker

4:08 pm on Thursday, October 4, 2012

Either word is fine Randall, now continue cowering under the kitchen table. Walker Recall fail, please remember, its happening again.

http://www.thefreedictionary.com/subsidizes

Reply

Craig

4:11 pm on Thursday, October 4, 2012

JB: Spot on! When the facts are against someone, they tend to distract people by finding small errors or spelling mistakes. I guess it is SOP for the LIB.
Seems to be more common as of late.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Randy1949

4:26 pm on Thursday, October 4, 2012

Facts? J.B. Schimdt runs a close second to Bryant Divelbiss in the sheer delusion department.

Ad hominems and untruths seem to be SOP for the Right.

Comment_arrow

J. B. Schmidt

4:29 pm on Thursday, October 4, 2012

@Randy
What facts did I get wrong?

As for the attacks, until they release his school transcripts, you cannot prove that he is smarter then his teleprompter.

Comment_arrow

Randy1949

4:39 pm on Thursday, October 4, 2012

If you were watching closely, J. B., President Obama made a quiet but cutting remark about Romney suddenly disavowing his tax plan -- all without the use of a teleprompter. "Never mind."

Comment_arrow

Randy1949

4:40 pm on Thursday, October 4, 2012

Frankly, I can't prove you're smarter than my micro-wave. The evidence seems to the contrary.

Comment_arrow

Craig

4:49 pm on Thursday, October 4, 2012

And he does it yet another time, deflect and change the subject rather than address the facts.
There you go again Randy.

Comment_arrow

J. B. Schmidt

4:51 pm on Thursday, October 4, 2012

@Randy
He disavowed the numbers cited Obama. He never disavowed his plan. You are parroting DNC talking points. Maybe the teleprompter would have pointed that to him. You liberals need to read the transcripts because once Obama talks your brains switch to test pattern and you simply accept everything he says.

Comment_arrow

James R Hoffa

7:14 pm on Thursday, October 4, 2012

@Randy1949 -

There you go again!

Romney did not abandon his tax plan - just because the biased secondary third party analysts, like the TPC, you, and Obama don't seem to be able to comprehend it, doesn't mean that he abandoned it! Hoffa has explained to you time and again.

Now then, if you could please explain the math of Obama's plan for us, that would be great!

The Anti-Alinsky

4:27 pm on Thursday, October 4, 2012

I want the job as Barack Hussein Obama's teleprompter operator.

Reply

The Anti-Alinsky

4:43 pm on Thursday, October 4, 2012

Barack Hussein Obama's new campaign strategy after last night's debate:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zDAmPIq29ro

Reply

ace

7:45 pm on Thursday, October 4, 2012

Obama has added Maddow, Schultz and Matthews as debate coaches.

He refers to them as his "Two and a Half Men."

Maddow: "I personally do not know, uh, who won this debate."

Translation: "Romney b!tch slapped Obama."

Reply

doug toader

5:38 am on Friday, October 5, 2012

Obama lost every debate 4 years ago. He won the election because he was the media darling. Guaranteed he smoked half a pack in the Limo on the way home.

Reply

Michael McClusky

6:19 am on Friday, October 5, 2012

Those people who blame Jim Lehrer about the president's debate performance just burn me. Jim has done an honorable and respectful job at PBS for many years. I do not think he altered the results at all!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Bob McBride

7:59 am on Friday, October 5, 2012

It's just more excuse making. Coming to the realization that the smartest man in the world can't think on his feet and change his game plan when it proves to be faulty is very difficult for his supporters. They're just lashing out. They should actually be thanking Jim Lehrer for going beyond the call of duty and attempting to get Obama to come out of his shell and respond in a fashion that would have made him look less overwhelmed and clueless than he already did.

Instead of bashing the guy who tried to help them, they should follow the lead of Al Gore and blame the altitude in Denver. It hurts no one.

Comment_arrow

Luke

8:16 am on Friday, October 5, 2012

Affirmative Action takes many forms.

Comment_arrow

Jay Sykes

8:19 am on Friday, October 5, 2012

ALGORE said the 'altitude',but, maybe he had in mind the 'attitude';think Emily Litella.

http://www.hulu.com/watch/4256

Comment_arrow

mau

2:40 pm on Friday, October 5, 2012

Romney was aggressive enough to not let Lehrer steer the debate in Obama's favor. Like the liberal moderators always tend to do.

Comment_arrow

CowDung

6:15 pm on Friday, October 5, 2012

I'm going to stick up for Lehrer on this one, Mau. I've always thought that Lehrer was one of the few newspeople that didn't show a bias...

Comment_arrow

Nuitari

6:45 pm on Friday, October 5, 2012

Lehrer was always known to be a great moderator. Unfortunately it looks like age has got the best of him or maybe he was intimidated as Obama treated him like a replacement NFL ref.

Keith Best

6:30 am on Friday, October 5, 2012

POTUS ( president of the US) is lost without TOTUS (teleprompter of the US)

Reply

Sally

6:52 am on Friday, October 5, 2012

It's very sad that it took 4 years to peel the layers from this onion. He has been protected by the media, sheltered from the White House press corps and hidden behind a teleprompter. It is just now that he has been exposed as the empty suit many of us thought he was all along.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Craig

10:20 am on Friday, October 5, 2012

And that onion turned out to be a real stinker.

Tommy

8:12 am on Friday, October 5, 2012

Without the use of teleprompters and speech writers Obama has nothing. He can't draw on his knowledge, experience, or passion for this country, because it isn't there. It's hilarious to see the dems reaction to the curtain being pulled back on their great and powerful Oz.

Reply

Craig

9:05 am on Friday, October 5, 2012

Air force One was late leaving the Denver airport. My sources tell me they were waiting for a delivery before they could take off. 500 pounds of ice was delivered, along with a bath tub. Seems Obama needed a 'soak'.
The ice was to prevent swelling of his freshly kicked ass, so it would not grow to that of Michelle's.

Reply
Comment_arrow

H.E. Pennypacker

9:22 am on Friday, October 5, 2012

Moochelle looked like the McDonald Land Grimace in her purple dress. Her scowl will be permanently frozen on her mug if she keeps it up.

Comment_arrow

Craig

9:33 am on Friday, October 5, 2012

Pennypacker: Why do you call her Moochelle?
That implies she looks like a cow.
She looks more like a penguin to me.
I am shocked they haven't put a slide out on the Presidential limo to make room for that bowling pin shape.

Comment_arrow

Craig

9:47 am on Friday, October 5, 2012

Pennypacker: OH...
oops. :-P

Impeach Now

9:29 am on Friday, October 5, 2012

Another GREAT article J.B.!! :-)

Reply

Bren

9:32 am on Friday, October 5, 2012

I have many questions about the Romney tax plan, and really about every plan he has dangled before us these last few months. It was interesting how he suddenly re-embraced his own original version of ACA in Massachusetts, it was only his desire to get the GOP nomination that made him walk away from it. I sort of take issue with that. And we actually have panels now that make the decisions that Romney claimed ACA would bring--they are insurance company review panels. Not good. I also noted that Romney continued to talk about the Medicare savings as "cuts" even after Obama explained (again) what it was. That suggested a rehearsed speech without ability to deviate. While in keeping with descriptions of Romney as a uber-cautious executive at Bain, it doesn't suggest a guy who thinks on his feet. We should be sending our best and brightest to the White House.

I'll also just point out that George W. Bush was the teleprompter president. That's not a criticism. Consider how remarks are taken out of context, etc. It's important to measure every word.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Craig

9:38 am on Friday, October 5, 2012

Let me make sure I get this straight. You have questions about Romneys tax plan, because you want to make sure you get your fair or free share?
But you have no problem with ObamaCare stealing funds from Medicare, and adding $1 Trillion of new spending each year?
I guess you like to bet your life savings in a card game without looking at your cards?

Comment_arrow

Craig

9:45 am on Friday, October 5, 2012

Don't frget the Bush tax cuts expire at the end of this year. Virtually every working American will pay higher taxes in 2013 unless Obama is ousted!
By 2016, expect your tax rates to double. There is no other way to pay for ObamaCare without a huge tax increase. The costs can not be added to the Nation's credit card, national security would be severely compramised.

Comment_arrow

Randy1949

9:55 am on Friday, October 5, 2012

@Bren -- Taking Mitt Romney at his word, we will have reductions in the tax rate and adjustments of deductions, meaning that some of us will be paying a lower tax rate on a higher AGI. There are going to be some winners and some losers, and who those might be is anyone's guess in the absence of hard details.

By the way, Romney has just said that his remarks about the 47% were completely wrong. Duh! It doesn't change the fact that he said them in what he assumed would be a safe environment. He's like one of those guys who will tell an offensive ethnic joke at a dinner party if he sees none of 'them' sitting around the table, only to realize too late that someone has a wife or brother-in-law in that group.

Comment_arrow

Craig

10:04 am on Friday, October 5, 2012

Randy I have been at one of those dinner parties.
Taking Mitt Romney at his word...
He is a man of his word, he even admits when he makes a statement that is incorrect.
The POTUS has been a liar for four years, sticking to the same story in the hopes of repetition making believers.
Actions speak louder than words, and the POTUS has shown he is a man of inaction and deceit.

Comment_arrow

J. B. Schmidt

10:05 am on Friday, October 5, 2012

@Bren
I don't believe that he ever disavowed the medical plan in Mass. That was one of the big issues that some Republican had with Romney. His point, something that all libs have trouble processing, is that Romney believes it is a state issue, not the issue of the federal government.

The difference between the panels of an insurance company and the panel of the federal government is that people can change insurance companies.

Are you claiming that $700million is not coming out of medicare by cutting the amount it pays doctors and hospital greatly decreasing the level of service?

As for rehearsed speech, how many times did the president repeat 5 trillion plus 2 trillion equals 7 trillion. That sound considerably more rehearsed, especially after Romney called it a lie. Also, doesn't Obama's stuttering and rambling give you more indication that he lacks the ability to think on his feet.

As I stated to Randy, you need to read the transcripts of the debate, because it appears that you libs flip to a test pattern in your brains when Obama speaks and simply download everything he says as absolute truth.

Comment_arrow

J. B. Schmidt

10:08 am on Friday, October 5, 2012

@Randy
So kinda of like saying that the mandate is not a tax or closing Gitmo.

Comment_arrow

Randy1949

10:20 am on Friday, October 5, 2012

@J.B. -- Neither of those implied that a segment of the population that for whatever reason has an AGI that falls short of having to pay federal income tax (combat soldiers, people with mortgages) yet use no government 'handouts' are refusing to take personal responsibility for their lives. He was flat out wrong, and either ignorant of the tax code or lying to his audience.

Refresh my memory, JB -- what happened when Obama tried to close Gitmo and house those prisoners in facilities here in the States? I recall some serious objections from the states where they'd be housed.

Comment_arrow

Bob McBride

10:44 am on Friday, October 5, 2012

Randy, that seems to be the objection every time an Obama promise that's gone unfulfilled is brought up. He ran into opposition of some sort. As if that's never happened to any of his predecessors. Constantly blaming others is not a sign of leadership. Neither is sulking and refusing to meet the challenge of debate, and then blaming everyone else when your opponent is declared the winner.

Comment_arrow

J. B. Schmidt

10:47 am on Friday, October 5, 2012

@Randy
If it was such a stinging remark that could have profound consequences for Romney's campaign, why didn't Obama use it in the debate? Maybe because, while Romney stated his case poorly, the truth is a large percentage of people on the government dole are not planning to vote for Romney and there is nothing he can do to change that. Also, it is something that the other half of America finds offensive and the wrong course for the US.

As for Gitmo, it is a line that shows Obama's ignorance for government policy and how the government works. A 3rd grader could have told you that moving terrorists onto American soil was a bad idea. A high school student could have told you that a non-US citizens does not have the same rights under the constitution. Obama made a promise with little foresight. Not to mention, if it was such a great idea, why didn't his party back him when they had complete control of both houses of congress for 2 years?

Comment_arrow

Randy1949

10:52 am on Friday, October 5, 2012

I don't think Barack Obama is the first President to have an initiative that didn't make it through Congress. Bush Sr. had to raise taxes, so did Reagan. Bill Clinton didn't deliver on a healthcare plan. Bush Jr. wasn't able to privatize Social Security, although that wasn't a campaign promise. It's the nature of political life in DC.

Comment_arrow

James R Hoffa

11:36 am on Friday, October 5, 2012

@Bren -

Hoffa has questions about Obama's tax plan, as the math just doesn't add up. How does Obama reach a balanced budget under his tax plan and create private sector jobs while reducing government dependency? Could you please explain it for us, walking us through the numbers?

Comment_arrow

James R Hoffa

11:45 am on Friday, October 5, 2012

@Randy1949 -

Once again, your upset that Romney's campaign is targeting federal income tax payers, but not upset that Obama's campaign plays the race card in pandering specifically to African Americans.

Sorry, but that's messed up!

Romney's 47% comment = applies to everyone premised solely on economic reality
African Americans for Obama = RACIST

Hoffa would rather support a non-racist.

Comment_arrow

Randy1949

11:54 am on Friday, October 5, 2012

@Hoffa -- Please give me that link again where President Obama supposedly targets African-American voters and no one else. I'd appreciate it.

Comment_arrow

James R Hoffa

12:45 pm on Friday, October 5, 2012

@Randy1949 -

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BdjoHA5ocwU

Hoffa has scoured the internet, but is unable to find any White Americans for Obama, Latin Americans for Obama, Asian Americans for Obama, Native Americans for Obama, Indian Americans for Obama, Pakistani Americans for Obama, Australian Americans for Obama, Aboriginal Americans for Obama, Eskimo Americans for Obama, etc.

Clearly, Obama has targeted his campaign upon a racial qualifier in reaching out solely and uniquely to African Americans, while not doing the same for any other racial or ethnic group.

Obama = Racist in Chief!

How can you openly support such a bigoted racist?

BTW - Still waiting for you to explain Obama's plan for us!

Comment_arrow

Randy1949

1:08 pm on Friday, October 5, 2012

That's at least two minorities other than African-Americans right there on the Obama/Biden website. I guess he's not as racist as you think. I din't even really 'scour' the net, just used Google.

Comment_arrow

James R Hoffa

2:01 pm on Friday, October 5, 2012

@Randy1949 -

Hoffa expects to see equal treatment from someone who claims to be for every American equally.

Romney at least targets them all in the same way, with equal treatment.

Obama made a video and gave a lofty speech for African Americans. So, where's the equal treatment from Obama for the other races/ethnicities?

Obama = Racist in Chief!

Comment_arrow

mau

2:57 pm on Friday, October 5, 2012

Exactly who is the judge of "what is the best and the brightest"?

Anybody ever record any of Obama's remarks he makes behind closed door? Anybody who picks Mr. Angry Mouth Rahm Emanuel as Chief of Staff has to approve of his behavior and comments.

Comment_arrow

mau

2:59 pm on Friday, October 5, 2012

@JRH, white groups are not allowed in America. They are racist.

H.E. Pennypacker

9:52 am on Friday, October 5, 2012

Obongocare is a tax, thus Barack Hussein Obama, mmmm mmmm mmmm, is responsible for the largest tax increase in the history of the US.

Reply

Nuitari

5:43 pm on Friday, October 5, 2012

Obama is half lazy and half angry.

Reply

Leave a comment