.
Feedback

Act 10 Saves School District $18.4 Million in Benefit Costs

New report says the Racine Unified School District has seen a big reduction in pension and health care costs because of changes in state's collective bargaining law.

The controversial state law that eliminated most collective bargaining rights for school employees reduced benefit costs for the Racine Unified School District by $18.4 million last school year, according to a report released Monday.

The bulk of the savings came from reductions in the district's share of employee retirement costs, the report by the Wisconsin Taxpayers Alliance said. In the 2010-11 school year, Racine Unified paid $7.99 million toward pension costs for workers; in 2011-12, that dropped to about $25,378, the report said.

The district also saved more than $10.4 million in health insurance costs, according to the report, which was based on data that public school districts provide to the state Department of Public Instruction. In 2010-11, Racine Unified spent $46.99 million on health care costs; that fell to $36.57 million last school year.

$366 million saved statewide

School districts across the state reduced benefit costs by $366 million this year, according to the report, which the organization says is the first in-depth look at the effect of Act 10 and the 2011-13 state budget on Wisconsin schools.

Most of the statewide savings come from districts no longer paying the employee share of retirement, the group said.

Of $366.3 million in reduced benefit costs, $240.7 million — or 66 percent — was from retirement contribution savings. Before passage of the 2011-13 state budget, most school districts and other governmental entities paid both the employee and employer share of retirement costs. Now public workers are required to pay the employee portion of retirement.

Because employees can no longer bargain over benefits under Act 10, many school districts increased health insurance co-payments, required higher cost sharing by employees or changed health insurance providers to reduce costs.

In 2012, public school health insurance costs fell $90.7 million, or 24.8%, from 2011 levels, the group said.

Other highlights of the report:

  • Total school district spending dropped $584 million in 2011-12, with 63 percent of that coming from benefit savings.
  • Lower salary costs saved districts $124.9 million, while other cost-cutting totaled $93.1 million.
  • Reduced salary costs were due to a combination of staff retirements and layoffs. In 2011-12, school districts employed 2,312 fewer staff than in 2010-11, a 2.3 percent reduction.

Report called GOP 'propaganda'

The report was not without some controversy, however.

Soon after it was released Monday, a group called One Wisconsin Now blasted it as "propaganda" to help Gov. Scott Walker as he "prepares to put Wisconsin’s children and public schools further in the hole by shifting resources to planned tax cuts to benefit the rich and corporations."

“Predictably, as Scott Walker begins making the case to hand out huge tax breaks to the rich and corporations, the corporate front group WISTAX tosses out propaganda to support his case,” said Scot Ross, executive director of One Wisconsin Now. “The Wisconsin Taxpayers Alliance is even more Republican than Wisconsin Manufacturers and Commerce, so this is hardly a surprise and their 'findings' should be taken with a grain of salt as big as Scott Walker's campaign finance report."

One Wisconsin Now said its review of campaign contributions made by board members of the Wisconsin Taxpayers Alliance showed that 92 percent of the $1.4 million in  donations went to Republicans.

Heather in Caledonia November 12, 2012 at 10:19 pm
So, One Wisconsin Now is saying the numbers were falsified? This information should be public, so how about One Wisconsin Now crunching the numbers and releasing their own report? I would be interested to see if they came up with different information.
James R Hoffa November 12, 2012 at 10:27 pm
It would seem in this case, numbers are numbers and facts are facts. So, did Patch confirm the WTA's numbers with Racine Unified? If not, why?
Richard Head November 13, 2012 at 04:09 am
Educators claim some special intelligence, or knowledge, then don't understand that what the Politicians have promised can NEVER be met.
It's the MATHEMATICS, STUPID! Even Calpers assumes a return of 8% a year, along with Milwaukee County, amongst most others. Um, a growth rate of 8% requires a doubling every ten years, which is an exponential function, and on a finite Planet with finite resources, well, returns at 8% are only good for 2-3 decades then no amount of money can cover the shortfall - because it's just not possible. So much for Educators and Intelligence. Two diametrically opposed things. If you have some time, and can understand College Level math - listen to Doctor Albert A. Bartlett explain the problem of exponential growth. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4JRVijo65W0 But hey! With that money you saved - why not donate a few $$$ to fight for social justice, right some wrongs, and perhaps send some Racine Players to Club Fed for a little vacation! "Pattern or Practice" http://www.indiegogo.com/patternorpractice
Heather in Caledonia November 13, 2012 at 01:35 pm
Exactly. I don't see how there was a "spin" put on these numbers, so if OWN wants to dispute it, they should provide us with a report of their own. Can the Patch verify with RUSD? Please show us if the numbers are being misrepresented.
a quiet conservative November 14, 2012 at 06:28 pm
Isn't One Wisconsin Now the same group that did a BBQ event while transporting people to early vote about 2 years ago?
Brian Dey November 14, 2012 at 07:29 pm
The numbers are DPI numbers and I have not seen Tony Evers or Ann Laing dispute them. That should be enough to prove they are correct when you don't hear the usual spin from RUSD.
Edward Willing November 14, 2012 at 08:53 pm
Heather, clearly OneWisconsinNow is lying, and distracting further, by talking about the donations of individuals associated with WISTAX.
Kind of funny, actually, how desperate they are to ignore the realities smacking them in the face. They should be happy for RUSD, instead they're acting like good things can't happen to school districts under Conservative policies. Pathetic.
Ed Holladay November 20, 2012 at 07:21 pm
They "saved" 18 million, but how much did they cut to begin with from state aid? That is the question.
The district claimed to have saved some ridiculous amount through the negotiated contract via health care costs. There are so many numbers floating around it is hard to know what to think. I do know that my daughter's class is up to 28 students. There were apparently some aids fired from the district. That saved money too. At some cost to the schools to be sure.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Caledonia Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Heather Asiyanbi (Editor) June 6, 2013 at 03:24 pm
Hello!
Denise Lockwood (Editor) June 4, 2013 at 11:14 am
Hi Anthony, The proposed WalMart site is on the southeast corner of 4 Mile and North Green BayRead More Road, just south of the Mosquito Inn.
a quiet conservative June 6, 2013 at 01:57 pm
There are not too many areas that can be easily accessed by the main roads. If a corner parcel wasRead More bought somewhere (perhaps Hwy 31 & Six mile) not a suggestion nor is it large enough. There would still be complaints. Who there be as much complaining if the Industrial building expanded onto the same parcel of land?
Rita Jeminez June 4, 2013 at 09:41 am
This place is great! I take the babies there and the run around and play and love it. So peacefulRead More too Recommend for everyone!
Denise Lockwood (Editor) June 1, 2013 at 07:08 am
Beautiful stuff Scott... Thanks for posting these.
Frances Martin May 31, 2013 at 02:20 pm
I can't tell, seriously, whether this is intended as a factual article or an advertisement forRead More United Healthcare, which i think is a health insurer. can that status be clarified?